🔗 Share this article

Well. From one perspective, the nation's protracted bid to host the UN climate conference next year has concluded unsuccessfully.

The effort ran for more than three years for the rights to put on the largest global environmental conference and sustainable business expo, which would have attracted many thousands of people to the city of Adelaide next fall.

This won't occur. Rather, the conference known as the UN climate meeting is headed to the resort city of Antalya, on the Turkish Mediterranean.

Letdown and Conflicting Signals

The result will be a significant disappointment to many people who had hoped organizing the climate carnival could help speed up Australia's shift from being a carbon-based economy to a renewable energy superpower, and bring global attention to the survival crisis facing Pacific island nations, who would have been co-hosts.

The procedure that resulted in defeat has been an opaque mess. In recent days, there have been questions that the prime minister and other high-ranking officials really wanted the bid to be approved. His statements were ambiguous at best. It translated to stories in the local and global press saying the government was withdrawing.

This contrasted with the communication being conveyed at the Cop30 talks in the Brazilian city, where the Australian climate change minister, Chris Bowen, had just declared the country was "in it to win it".

Uncertain support is a recurring problem for Australia's Cop31 bid. While Bowen championed it, other senior members of the government have only sometimes appeared to care.

The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, traditionally responsible for global environmental talks, has been uninvolved and sometimes outright opposed.

Evidence suggests the prime minister has considered international climate meetings a priority. He hasn't attended one since becoming prime minister in 2022. We'll never know, but some will wonder if more could have been done to secure the hosting rights.

An Alternative View

That's one interpretation. But there is another way to look at it.

In the context the Cop30 talks this week in Brazil – and from an global viewpoint – the decision on this week may, perversely, have been the best result possible.

The minister outlined on Wednesday an unprecedented deal that he was developing with his Turkish counterpart, the Turkish minister. The Turkish government would be the conference leader, host and effective event manager, and the Australian delegation – Bowen himself – would assume a role as "president of negotiations", managing almost all nations on the stuff that the nations actually attend for – the talks on how to collectively combat the climate crisis.

There would also be a increased emphasis on the Pacific, including a preliminary meeting on an Pacific island.

Reasons for Doubt

Multiple reasons exist for doubt. The two nations do not have a close relationship. The details of the agreement had not been completed at the moment of announcement. The whole thing could collapse before it gets started.

But it could also be a way to recover value from what appeared to be an approaching car crash for the international cooperation on climate change.

Turkey is widely seen in the global community as having been hellbent on creating disruption in the UN climate process. This framework is designed to operate by consensus. Usually, that means if there are several nations in the competition those with weaker backing either withdraw gracefully, or a deal is quietly done to persuade them to exit the race.

The Turkish bid clearly had weaker endorsement than Australia and Pacific islands to host Cop31. At least 24 of the 28 countries responsible for nominating next year's venue had backed the southern pitch.

However, exceptionally, Ankara refused to yield. The word "bastardry" has been thrown around in recent days, and not just by Australians.

Geopolitical Context

Turkey's obstinacy can be interpreted as a manifestation of the fracturing geopolitical climate. With the US absent under Donald Trump, there has been no dominant nation with the influence to stare down the petroleum exporters that offered the Turks with certain protection.

The Turkish president is considered close to the Russian leader. Some countries feared a summit obstructed from the leadership if his administration led the discussions. Germany did not want to have to organize an underprepared Cop31 at the UN environmental office in the German city, which is what would have happened under UN rules if the deadlock wasn't resolved.

A Creative Solution

A path through was necessary. International frameworks is flawed and often unsettling to observe, but multilateral action has demonstrably had an impact in the battle with global heating. The Turkey-Australia arrangement is a creative idea that maintains progress when it is needed more than ever.

Despite reasonable concerns of the federal administration over its hypocritical support for increasing carbon-based exports, climate activists who attend UN conferences see the minister as a force for good in the negotiations. He has been requested to lead discussion groups at multiple summits he has attended.

This is significant. While some have dismissed the role of a "chief negotiator", experts from academic institutions and veteran observers at environmental negotiations say it is crucial to their success.

"Every successful Cop has been shaped by a leader holding the pen who can understand, build consensus and deliver an ambitious outcome. This occurred in the German capital in 1995, in the Mexican resort in 2010 and Paris in 2015. We saw the opposite in the Danish city in 2009," he says. "This position is critical at the Cop except for making sure that delegates are fed."

Unanswered Questions

There are plenty of unanswered questions. As an illustration, civil society plays a vital role at climate conferences. What, if at all, can the Australian government do to stop a crackdown on NGO participation by the Turkish leadership?

Possibly little. But that doesn't stop this arrangement looking like the most promising opportunity possible to have a conference that may offer something for the Pacific, the nation and the world. This attempt is justified.