🔗 Share this article

In a unsigned order, the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed Texas to use a revised congressional district plan that is projected to include as many as five additional conservative-tilting districts. The 6-3 order, released on Thursday, approves a request by the state to lift a lower court's ruling that had rejected the boundaries in November.

Justices' Explanation

The lower court wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, causing considerable confusion and disrupting the fine federal-state balance in elections, the justices wrote in explaining its ruling.

The federal court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably classified voters based on their race – a method known as racial gerrymandering – when it enacted the redistricting plan. It had ordered the state to use the maps established after the most recent national count for the forthcoming election.

Strong Opposition

In a forcefully written dissent, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's ruling. She argued that it disregarded the work of the lower court, noting that its ruling was actually authored by a judge appointed by ex-President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan wrote in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, The majority's order solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its increased partisan advantage, will govern next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas citizens, for no good reason, will be placed in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced consistently, is a infraction of the constitution.

National Redistricting Battle

The court's action is part of a national fight over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in efforts to transform the U.S. House map to bolster a slim Republican hold. Ordinarily, map-drawing takes place after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to proceed with a aggressive mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a chain reaction among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted new maps that are estimated to yield several additional GOP-friendly seats. The opposition, for their part, have pushed back with their own plans in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Political Responses

Lone Star State top lawyer hailed the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order upheld Texas's prerogative to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes aligned with the GOP. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he remarked.

Conversely, opposition party officials decried the decision. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the chair of a major Democratic campaign committee.

A leading Democratic leader argued the court had once again shredded its standing by upholding a discriminatory map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.